교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Cone Star Emergency Motor Vehicle.
On October 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the above ambulances on the 10:40 on October 16, 2013, and led the Defendant to the Hab Park from the home-pluging side of the liberian Republic of Korea located in the Gyeong-gu, Daegu north-gu.
In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to violate the stop signal and neglected to follow the way signal from the apartment on the side of the Eglish Eglish Eglish apartment, which was driven by the victim D (I, 41 years old) to the right side of the emergency vehicle of the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence caused the victim D’s injury to brain-dead sugar, etc. requiring medical treatment for about 15 days, the victim F (the 23-year old age), who was the first passenger, to suffer from the injury to blood transfusion due to the external wound that requires medical treatment for about 6 weeks, the injury to the victim G (the 32-year age), etc. requiring medical treatment for about 3 weeks to the victim G (the 32-year age), and the injury to the victim H (the 20-year age age), who was the first passenger, to suffer from the injury to the Ha (the 20-year age age) that requires medical treatment for about 6 weeks.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of each police statement related to D, F and G;
1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;
1. Each medical certificate for F, D, G, and H;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of photographs);
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act to order to attend a compliance driving lecture [the scope of recommendations] general traffic accident.