When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and B are married couple, and C is a person who has taken the same standard with daily allowances at the request of the defendant.

On August 24, 2014, from around 07:40 to 16:50 on the same day, the Defendant collected the total amount of eight times in the standard trees owned by the victims, using the standard extraction device in L owned by the victims H, in G owned by the victims H, in I, J, and in L owned by the victims K, the Defendant collected the total amount of eight times in the standard trees owned by the victims.

Therefore, the defendant, in collusion with B and C, stolen the standard which is the product from the forest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused, C, and B;

1. The first police statement to K;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to photographs of seized articles), a report on investigation (related to photographs, such as the scene of the seizure), and a report on investigation;

1. Article 73 (1) of the Creation and Management of Forestry Resources Act and Article 73 (1) of the Act on the Establishment and Management of Criminal Records and Selection of Fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;