A. The lower court’s punishment of Defendant 4 million won (a fine of KRW 4 million) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime is disadvantageous, and the crime of this case and special larceny of the first head of the crime of this case, which became final and conclusive in the judgment of the court below, are concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. The Defendant reflects his fault. In full view of the various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, including these circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it does not seem that the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

However, pursuant to Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, "Defendant H" in Part II, Part V of the judgment of the court below, "Defendant H" shall be deemed "Defendant and H", "Defendant H" shall be deemed "Defendant and H", "the first order in September 201" in Part 11 of the same part shall be deemed "the first order in September 201", "the second order in September 201" in Part 13 of the same part shall be deemed "the second order in September 201", "the first police officer in September 201" in the part of Part 13 of the same part shall be deemed "the first order in September 201", and Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be deemed to be "the second order in September 201"

1. If selection of a selective fine is added, rectification shall be made;

.