However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 29, 2013, around 03:00 on November 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime against the victim C; (b) made soup to the five-story E located in Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu, Busan; (c) the victim C took advantage of the crepan, thereby resulting in theft of one smartphone (galno No. 2) equivalent to one million won at the market price on the part of the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 05:05 on December 7, 2013, committed a crime against the Victim F, committed soup room as set forth in paragraph (1) around 05:05 on December 7, 2013, the Defendant stolen one gallon (gallon S4) of a smartphone equivalent to one million won at the market price on the side of the victim, by taking advantage of the cresh.

3. On December 7, 2013, around 05:10 on December 7, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim G, in a soup PC room as set forth in paragraph (1), and the victim G was stolen by taking advantage of the cresh in the victim’s head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of G, F and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decisions 200

1. The main sentence of Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;