beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.08 2016고정1302

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-priced motor vehicle B.

On March 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the said motor vehicle at a shooting distance at the entrance of the Donam-si, Yongcheon-si, and transferred the said motor vehicle to a speed of about 40 to 50km each hour at a speed of about 40 to 50km each hour among the three-lane roads on the Do 3-lanes from the boundary of the New-si, Yongcheon-si.

At this point, the signal apparatus is an intersection installed, and there was a victim C (V, 36 years old) driving dspke-off vehicle of the victim C (V, 36 years old) who was going to an air-section in Yongcheon-cheon in accordance with the straight line of the above intersection, and thus, the person engaged in driving service was obliged to exercise the duty of care to make a bypass according to the three-lane line, the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the passage prior to the right of the right of the passage.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the instant spke vehicle to run the center line on the left side in order to avoid collision with the Defendant’s vehicle by negligence, which is not a vehicle prior to the right line, and caused the said sprink vehicle to run the front part of the said sprink vehicle in front of the instant sprink vehicle and the front part of the Fprink vehicle in front of the victim E (27) driving in the signal transmission atmosphere from the opposite direction of the said sprink vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as multiple scambling, etc. which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim E, such as cambling base and tensions, etc. at the same time, destroyed the 87,677 won of repairing the front cambing vehicle, which is the damaged vehicle, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victims, even though the f30,834 won of the F cambing truck, which is the damaged vehicle, was damaged to repair the front cambing vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C.