양수금
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 2,443,40 and KRW 2,036,140 among them on March 21, 2015.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 23, 2009, the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of apartment buildings (hereinafter “instant apartment sales contract”) that purchased Ep-Pdididid Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ep-Pdid Korea”) Nos. 204 and 1201 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) in the Gan-si District B complex (hereinafter “E-Pdiddid Korea”).
B. The sales contract in the instant case requires the buyer to bear management expenses regardless of whether or not the buyer has occupied from the day after the expiration date of the occupancy period designated by Ep-PD Korea, and E-PD Korea completed the instant apartment after designating the occupancy designation period from June 18, 2010 to August 17, 2010.
C. The Defendant did not follow the occupancy procedure such as completing the registration of ownership transfer on the instant apartment after the expiration of the designation date for occupancy, and did not pay the management expenses (from August 18, 2010 to June 201, 201) for the instant apartment to be paid to Efddiend Korea (from August 18, 2010 to June 201, the day following the expiration date of the designation for occupancy) and the late payment amount of KRW 2,443,40 in total.
On April 15, 2014, EFD Korea transferred to the Plaintiff the management expenses claim amounting to KRW 2,443,400 against its Defendant, and notified the Defendant of the assignment of claims by way of content-certified mail on May 2, 2014.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Evidence Nos. 7 through 9, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff who is the assignee of management expenses the above amount of KRW 2,443,40 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from March 21, 2015 to the day of full payment, as requested by the plaintiff, with respect to the above amount of KRW 2,036,140 and the amount of KRW 2,036,140.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is so accepted.