However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven B Poter cargo vehicles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.148% alcohol concentration in blood from the section of about 1k to the 1119 safety center in the south-ro of the same 57-lane from the front of an influent restaurant located in the Gu-Sim of Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, to the 119 safety center.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of BPoter trucks in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On February 11, 2017, the Defendant driving the above cargo vehicles around 20:50, and driving the above cargo vehicles along the 57-lane south-ro 119 safety center in Daegu on the ground of the Gu office, along the two-lanes of the 5-lane 119 safety center in the Gu office, according to the two-lanes of the road between the two-lane 5-lane 4 and the two-lane 5-lane.

At the time, the signal waiting vehicle was at night and at the front of the defendant's moving direction, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by properly manipulating the front door and the left door and the left door, and accurately manipulating the steering direction and the brakes, thereby preventing the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving while under the influence of alcohol content 0.148% in blood, neglected to operate the electric-way city and operation of the brake system, caused the Defendant to see the part of the victim C(38 tax) driver's back of the passenger vehicle in the front direction of the Defendant's driving which was parked in the signal air from the front direction of the road, and caused the Defendant to see the back of the passenger vehicle in the front direction of the Defendant's truck lane by the Defendant, and due to the shock, the said low-income vehicle is now pushed in the future, and the part of the victim E(35 tax)'s driving of the victim E(35 tax) which was parked in the air along the signal signal at the front direction of the same lane.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above duties, thereby inflicting injury on the victim C, such as chills, tensions, etc. in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the pipes and dysiums in the part where it is necessary to give approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim E, and any other item and sysium in the part where it is unknown.