2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects on the defendant, and that the defendant suffered serious injury to the case.

However, it is not determined that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable considering the following: (a) the Defendant stolen a vehicle without a driver’s license; (b) the Defendant committed a crime that causes a traffic accident while driving the vehicle without a driver’s license; (c) the two passengers died in the same accident; (d) the 16th degree of damage was very heavy; and (e) the Defendant did not have any effort to recover damage until the trial; (d) the Defendant did not make any effort to recover damage; and (e) the Defendant had a number of records of juvenile protective disposition; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and method of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after the instant crime were committed.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.