2. Determination: (a) The Defendant has a favorable condition, such as the confession of all the crimes of this case, the Defendant made a statement that his mistake will be repented in depth; and (b) each damage amount is relatively minor; (c) the Defendant has been sentenced to a fine of the same kind of crime and imprisonment several times. In particular, each of the crimes of this case has been committed on December 8, 201 after the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same crime, and the execution of the sentence was completed, and then committed during the period of repeated crime. The Defendant was subject to a fine several times for the same crime committed before the crime of this case; (d) the Defendant was already subject to no agreement with the victims; (e) the Defendant was unable to make efforts to recover damage; and (e) other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., the Defendant’s assertion that the above punishment of this case is reasonable and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.