특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended sentence for October, one hundred and twenty hours of community service order, and twenty-four hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) is too unreasonable.
2. The fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and agreed with the victim is favorable to the defendant.
However, not only has the history of having been punished for the same crime, but also the crime of this case was committed by the defendant leaving the site without taking any measures such as aiding the victim after traffic accident, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the defendant, there is no change in circumstances that can be considered for sentencing from the judgment of the court below to the judgment of the court below, and there are various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the motive, background, means and result of the crime of this case, and the situation after the crime, and the result of applying the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.