However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, who resided in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Mawon-si, 101 Dong 406, was under stress due to noise problems between the upper floor of 506, the upper floor. On March 21, 2017, around 18:50, the Defendant expressed the victim C (V, 63 years old) who visited this area as “Seman-si,” expressed the victim C (Seman-si) who visited this area at around 101 Dong 506, and caused the victim’s injury, such as a 4 or more dyp, which affected the victim’s left side of the victim at around 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 247 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 247 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Confession, reflection, and non-existence of punishment);

1. From the mitigated area (two months to one year) of the mitigated area (a person who has been specially mitigated) (referring to a person who has been specially mitigated), referring to the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] general injury;

2. The degree of injury suffered by the victim who has been sentenced to the sentence is serious, and the defendant can have the same criminal records to be considered disadvantageous to him/her.

However, when the defendant reached an agreement with the victim, the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant, the fact that the injured party recognizes the mistake and reflects it, and other punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the defendant's age, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.