When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and on October 11, 2014, the judgment became final and conclusive.

Since the defendant did not have a certain occupation and did not have cash, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he gets on a taxi.

Nevertheless, at around 00:40 on July 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was driving as if he would pay the taxi fee if he arrived at the destination to the victim D, who is a taxi engineer, in front of the metropolitan area located in the north-gu Seoul metropolitan area, and (b) was boarding a taxi to the front of the E zone located in the F of the Gwangju Mine area.

The Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount by deceiving the victim, thereby failing to pay 9,480 won of taxi fares.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Receipts:

1. Previous convictions: Application of investigation reports (verification of previous convictions and facts for concurrent crimes by the accused), meetings of agreement on cases, copies of judgments (Seoul Central District Court 2014dan744, 2475) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.