A. According to the Land Survey Book prepared in the Japanese colonial era, “I” with the domicile in “H” is indicated as being subject to assessment of Nos. 1,640 PJ in Y-gun, Youngsan-gun.

B. Thereafter, the land was converted into the area and its name was changed to the land indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. On October 22, 1932, the Plaintiff’s prior ship K died, and on October 22, 1932, the Plaintiff’s prior ship L, a South-North and Australia heir, inherited the property solely.

The deceased on September 19, 200, and the deceased on September 19, 200, Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C, each of whom received 1/4 shares of the deceased L, and 1/12 shares of the deceased M (the deceased on October 2, 1981, the deceased on October 2, 1981, and the deceased Non-Party NN, the wife of the above M, died on December 1, 1981), respectively, by inheritance on joint representation by Plaintiff D, Plaintiff E, and Plaintiff F.

(The deceased wifeO died on December 10, 1990, and the deceased's other children P died on August 8, 1991, and the deceased Q on December 19, 196, respectively). D.

According to a certified copy of the network L, which is the head of the Plaintiff’s fleet K, the network L is written as born on October 14, 1914.

E. The instant land is unregistered and does not include a titleholder on its land cadastre.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including additional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts and the purport of the entire argument, I, the name of the Plaintiff’s fleet K and the name of the assessment, are the same as Chinese name, and in view of the fact that the network K, the South-North of the network K, was born in the long-term R on October 14, 1914, the Plaintiff’s prior domicile and the name of the assessment, the address of I, the name of the Plaintiff’s prior domicile and the name of the assessment, appears to be the same (hereinafter “SMyeon was combined by the administrative district consolidation in 1914).

In addition, considering the fact that there seems to be a person with a name U in the vicinity of the above domicile at the time of the preparation of the Land Survey Book, the Plaintiff’s prior network K.