배당이의
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The court's explanation concerning this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
[Supplementary or additional parts] From the second 9th of the judgment of the court of first instance to the 11th of the second 9th to the 2nd 11th of the judgment.
Meanwhile, D appropriated the Plaintiff with the interest of KRW 600,00,000 on December 1, 201, KRW 600,000 on December 31, 2011, KRW 600,000 on January 26, 2012, KRW 600,000 on March 5, 2012, KRW 600,000 on April 3, 2012, KRW 600,00 on May 31, 2012, KRW 60,000 on May 31, 2012, KRW 306,00,000 on July 2, 201, KRW 600 on September 1, 201, KRW 60,000 on January 6, 2015, KRW 2037,000,000 on April 31, 2012.
"A." shall be added to "A." in the front of "each of these evidences" in the third 7th sentence of the first instance court.
In addition, the first instance court’s 4th 11th 1st son of the first instance court’s decision “defluences the Defendant’s payment of public charges, such as the instant apartment management fees, electricity, and gas charges, considering the absence of any evidence.”
On the fourth 19th 19th 19th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, “The instant dividend table prepared on the premise that the Defendant is a legitimate small lessee. Therefore, the instant dividend table is unfair, so the dividend amount of the Defendant shall be KRW 14 million among the instant dividend table shall be KRW 0,000, and the dividend amount of the Plaintiff shall be KRW 14 million from KRW 0,000,000, respectively.”
2. As such, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted for the reasons that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is not reasonable. It is so decided as per