소유권보존등기말소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) adding "No. 1-2" after "No. 7" to "No. 1-2" in the last 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) changing the "Land Survey Book" in the first 5th 1 to the "Redemption Register"; (c) changing the overall 5th 5th 7th 5th 5th 5th 7 as follows; and (d) changing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following additional determinations, it is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in the main sentence
[Supplementary portions] The defendant asserts that the land in paragraph (4) of the attached Table No. 4 is not returned to the original owner because the land in the attached Table No. 1-2 is repaid in farmland. However, even if according to the statement No. 1-2, it is stated that the defendant received four lots of land in addition to the above land in the redemption ledger of Y, which the defendant claims that he is a distributor, and it is unclear whether the amount of redemption is included in the attached Table No. 4 of the above amount because the amount of redemption is stated only the amount of redemption of E and W land due to the amount of redemption, and it is unclear whether the amount of redemption is included in the attached Table No. 4 of the above amount, and even if the amount of redemption is included in the amount of redemption of the land in the attached Table No. 4 of the above amount, the first chapter of the redemption collection list includes the amount of redemption of the above amount of redemption from 4283 to 4292, but it is stated again in the next chapter that there exists the unpaid amount from 4286 to the land owner.