폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of six months, and defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of four months.
except that this shall not apply.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A around April 2014, he/she established and operated E, an insurance agent of D Co., Ltd., and worked as the head of the headquarters from October 2015. Defendant B, Defendant C, as the staff of the risk management team employed by Defendant F, the operator of the above E on Nov. 1, 2015, and Defendant C, as the insurance solicitor of E, will be held liable for civil and criminal liability from the insurance solicitor when the insurance solicitor becomes effective.
“A person who has engaged in the business, etc. to collect a letter to the effect that “” and to call to the insurance solicitor to prevent the invalidation of the insurance contract solicited.
1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants
A. On December 4, 2015, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement) made the Defendants enter the above E representative room located in the third floor of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, from around 10:00 to around 15:00 of the same day, the Defendant A instructed Defendant B and the Defendant C to correct their visits, and accordingly, Defendant C opened the door of the above representative room.
Since then, Defendant A had the victims make their personal phone calls known to the clients, and it is f0,00 because there has not been so far, i.e., this dogping, and there has been no internal organ so far;
It is not the attendance time according to the mind of the match, and it is necessary to hear the pair of opinions.
“In the end, the victims were faced with the victim I’s face, and the victims were collected with insurance contract-related documents recruited by the victims, and “(insurance premiums of contracts with the possibility of being effective)” today.
In addition, if the money was put into money or it was not processed by telephone to the customers, it should be cut off, and if it was not processed within the today, it would be h. h. h.). Defendant A threatened the victim I’s flab, and Defendant A was flab.