2. The judgment of the court below committed the instant crime during the period of parole of imprisonment with prison labor due to violent crimes, and the fact that the Defendant consumeds all of the Defendant as entertainment expenses, etc. under the pretext of agreement with the victim D, etc., without paying at all the amount of seven million won, under the pretext of agreement with the victim C, etc., but at the same time, it is advantageous to the following: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake; (b) the amount of the compromise is not large; (c) the victim D, L and/or agreed with the victim D; and (d) it appears that C was the fact that the Defendant was forced to commit indecent acts by indecent acts by the victim D, etc.; and (b) the court below’s punishment is deemed unreasonable because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors as a whole, such as the background of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.