Defendant

A and Defendant B are those who engage in agriculture and are directors of F-friendly societies. A.

On October 23, 2013, the Defendants were forced to leave the meeting room to the auditor Ha (the 68 years of age and south) of the clan in order to hold a meeting on the settlement of accounts and operation of the operation expenses of the clan at the office of the F clan Association located in G in Namyang-si, Namyang-si. Defendant A got off the victim's flab, and Defendant B got off the victim's flab, and Defendant B had the victim's flab, etc. at the price of the victim's flab, etc. with the victim's flab, etc. for about 14 days at the victim's flab.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

B. Defendant B assaulted the victim I (the 56 years of age per 56, South)’s arms to speak in the above assault, such as cutting, pushing, tight, and tearing.

Judgment

A. As to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, the Defendants asserted that there was no assault against the victim H in a consistent manner from the investigative agency to this court.

Therefore, there is a victim H, I and J's statement and injury diagnosis report as evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in this case.

However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to believe that H and I’s statements are not consistent or are inconsistent with witness statements recognized as credibility.

In addition, the statement and the statement of injury by J alone are insufficient to recognize that the defendants suffered injury as stated in the facts charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.

(1) First, we examine the statement of H that the Defendants jointly assaulted himself.

H is the initial police called "K's external name flat and flatd into the flat."