매매대금
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. 1) CFF prior to the new construction of Saturdays, in 2010, was selected as a subsidized project operator for a local specialized project (new construction of Saturdays) in 2010, and was able to receive 434,000,000 won out of 720,000,000 won for a new construction of Saturdays modernization as a subsidy. 2) The Defendant (CFF) (the director of the CFF; the director of May 20, 2010; and the resignation of May 20, 2010) with respect to the subsidized project as described in paragraph 1 of the above Article, the Defendant paid 286,00,00,000 won for the new construction of Saturdays modernization (=720,000,000,000 won for the above corporation’s own share of the subsidy and the entire list of each land is 40,000 won or less (hereinafter referred to as “each land”).
2) On the ground, the lower court determined that the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the part of the lower court, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
A) A new construction is made, and from September 1, 201 to August 31, 2026, an agreement was concluded to be entrusted with the right to cultivate the said house. Of each land of this case, the land of this case was owned by the Defendant; however, the land of this case was owned by G; the land of this case was owned by H; the land of this case was owned by H; the land of this case No. 3 was owned by H; the land of this case No. 4 was owned by the Defendant; the land of this case No. 2 and No. 3 was owned by the Defendant from the previous date, and the land of this case No. 2 and No. 3 was leased by the Defendant and were owned by the Defendant. 3) While the Plaintiff was unable to create the instant house, the Defendant requested F to raise money equivalent to his own share.
4) In this regard, the Defendant is expected to take charge of cultivating Saturdays between F and D in the vicinity of each land of this case, and the Defendant is in charge of cultivating Saturdays, distributing natives produced D, and raising and managing funds, and in the name of E farming association.