A. On September 9, 2016, from around 11:55 to 04:17 of the same month, the Defendant used the Defendant’s mobile phone from around 11:45 to around 11:5 of the same month, in the victim B’s mobile phone of the same month, the Defendant’s text message, stating that he left the victim’s editing pictures, such as his pictures, which the victim took a bath in the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the victim, and the victim’s mobile phone number and “The victim’s husband’

information about numbers sought to be known; or

By transmitting the text message of “”, the victim threatened the husband, etc. of the victim with the fact that he/she was aware of the her husband, etc.

B. On September 28, 2016, at around 09:07, the Defendant: (a) taken CCTV installed in the victim’s house located in the Gumi-si, U.S.A., at around 09:07, the victim was threatened with the victim’s family members, etc., by viewing that the victim and the Defendant were exposed to the CCTV screen of the Defendant’s mobile phone screen in a video recording.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, each of the instant public prosecutions of this case was submitted on January 10, 2017, which was after each of the instant public prosecutions was instituted, to the effect that the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant. Thus, each of the instant public prosecutions of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327