beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2019.07.16 2019나30409

공사대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 30, 2018, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Defendant for removal and renovation of the roof board of an existing building in the Chungcheongnam-gun C, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant construction”).

The detailed details of the instant construction work are Adong roof board, water cells, events removal work, B's interior board removal work, removal work of external water tank tank removal work, etc.

B. 1) Written estimate on the instant construction project submitted by the Plaintiff to the Defendant on March 30, 2018 (Evidence A No. 1, hereinafter “instant estimate”)

2) The written statement is as shown in the separate sheet. 2) The written statement of this case states that the daily wage of KRW 870,000 (the number of days of removal work is expected to be required for approximately 3-4 days a day, and the number of days of work is expected to be required for approximately 50,000 (the number of days of work for removal work is calculated to be required for approximately 3-4 days a day, and the number of days of work later is calculated based on the number of days of work) is to be disbursed as the cost of this case.

C. On April 2, 2018 and April 3, 2018, the Plaintiff worked at the construction site of this case between the two titles.

1) The Defendant paid KRW 1,500,000 to the Plaintiff as the name of the instant construction cost. 2) In addition, the Defendant paid KRW 1,100,000 to the equipment company in the written estimate of this case to be borne by the Plaintiff during the instant construction work.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On March 2018, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was introduced to the Defendant from the early policeman D, and on March 29, 2018, the Plaintiff sought an explanation about the construction outline, and then sent the instant quotation to the Defendant and D on March 30, 2018. The Defendant confirmed the said quotation and ordered the instant construction to the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff completed the instant construction work on April 2, 2018 and April 3, 2018.

Therefore, the defendant.