However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 16:30 on November 14, 2013, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the accused case, such as the violation of the Juvenile Protection Act against the said court No. 2013Ka-Ma3572, which was located in Gwangju Dong-dong, Gwangju District Court No. 102, and became aware of the right to refuse to testify and made testimony after being notified of the right to refuse to testify.

The defendant testified in the above court as follows: ① in relation to the issue of whether D's contact with customers at the E main point of the operation of C, the defense counsel "F attended as a witness at the last day, and stated that "D was working at the E main point operated by the defendant for a period of seven days during January, 200." However, the defendant testified that "D was working at the E main point when the above period and the witness served overlaps with the period and the witness," and the counsel testified as "I do not know that F was working at the E main point," and there is no testimony that "I asked F to speak, if so, if I asked F to send a female employee to E main point."

However, the facts revealed that the above D had been engaged in entertainment between the police officer of Jan. 2013 and the first police officer of Feb. 2013, 2013, by drinking alcohol with several customers with no name and drinking alcohol at the above EM point, and the Defendant requested the F, an employee of EM, who works for EM at the above EM point, to post a telephone to EM and send a female employee to EM.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The fourth protocol of trial is the copy of the examination of witness in Gwangju District Court case F in 2013 Highest 3572 case F and D.