피고인은 2012. 8. 17. 01:22경부터 같은 날 02:05경 사이 서울 종로구 B 소재 ‘C’ 지하주차장에서, 피고인이 위 지하주차장 입구 바닥에서 팬티만 입고 누워 있다는 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관 피해자 경장 D(남, 38세)이 피고인을 달래며 순찰차에 태우려고 하자 이에 화가 나, 피해자에게 “야 십쌔끼들아 죽을래 너희들 다 죽여버리겠다”라고 욕설하며 피고인의 주먹으로 피해자의 뒤통수를 1대 때리고, 계속하여 피고인의 손으로 피해자의 근무복 조끼를 잡아 흔들었다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 visit duty of the victim who is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence List 6);

1. In light of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the choice of punishment, reasons for sentencing of imprisonment [the decision of punishment] : Obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of duties / [the scope of recommending punishment] 6 months - one year and 4 months [the decision of sentence] : Crimes that interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers by using violence are not less severe, there are records of being punished by several fines for violent crimes, circumstances favorable to the escape after prosecution : The case itself is relatively minor, in light of the degree of assault or degree of damage, the case itself is relatively minor, and there is no criminal record exceeding fine, and all sentencing factors indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the defendant's age, occupation, environment, character and conduct, circumstances, contents, contents, etc.