If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

A. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) is the owner of an officetel in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, and the victim D (58 tax, South) is the chairperson of the management and operation committee of the above officetel.

On August 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 19:57, and around 100 the owners of the above officetels participated in the Kakao Stockholming room; (b) on August 19, 2015, the Defendant occupied the victim’s entry into the above officetel on around 2010.

E Notwithstanding the fact that there was no embezzlement of the amount collected from the owners of officetels in the electricity charge from 2 billion won and around 2012, the commercial rent, management fee, etc. received from the E department store, “Doi Doi Doa Doa Doa Doa Doa e received from E, for the management fee for the commercial rent for the commercial rent for the commercial rent for which

Along to half, a false statement was posted on the following facts: “The management fee to be used for the public purpose and the electricity fee to be used in embezzlement: from one to another.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, by means of information and communications networks, destroyed the reputation of the victim by disclosing false information openly.

B. Around August 26, 2015, the Defendant posted a statement on the part of the owners of the above officetels, stating that “The name and the name and the name and the name and the name indicated in Bloa or bean Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Accent Bccent Accent Accent Bccent Accent Accent Bccent Accent Accent Bccent Accent Accent Accent Accent Bccent Accent Bc

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The content of the Kakao Stockholm conversation (an act for the public interest if the purpose of slandering is recognized;

In light of the contents of disposition not to institute a prosecution against D and the fact that materials to serve as the basis for the defendant's act are not submitted, the purpose of defamation is to be recognized).

1. Relevant legal provisions and information and communications networks concerning criminal facts;