However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:35 on May 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received fighting at a D cafeteria located in Ansan-si, A and received 112 report, and called “F was subject to assault; (b) personal information is disclosed; (c) may be arrested as a flagrant offender if he refuses to accompany without disclosing his personal information; and (d) upon receipt of a request to accompany, the Defendant: (a) was sent to E; (b) on the spot in which he was seated, and (c) was sent to E, and there was no error of “a ringer; (d) C typosis; (e) he was sent to E.g., “I will not open. I will do so later; and (d) when I want to have the right side of the left arms one time.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the victim, and at the same time, the victim was placed with the right eyebrow in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to E statements, investigation reports (attached to a medical certificate and quotation);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the degree of damage is not serious);