A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Defendant

The Defendant, at the time of the crime of special injury in this case, was in a state of mental disability with mental retardation and exemption.

Each sentence of unfair sentencing (the first instance judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 6 months, and 2 months: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

The second instance court’s punishment is too unfilled and unfair.

As to the judgment of ex officio, the Defendant filed each appeal against the judgment of the second instance, and this court decided to hold the two appeals together.

Since each of the judgment below's crimes is concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, one sentence should be imposed in accordance with Article 38 (1) of the Criminal Act, the judgment below cannot be maintained as it is.

However, despite the above reasons for ex officio reversal, the defendant's assertion of mental disability is still subject to the judgment of this court, and it will be examined in the below.

피고인의 심신미약 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사실 및 사정 즉, ① 피고인은 경찰 조사 당시 신경안정제나 수면제를 복용하였는지 여부에 관하여 아무런 진술을 하지 아니하다가, 검찰 조사 당시부터 “차에 가서 신경안정제를 먹었습니다.”, “소주 3병에 맥주 4병 정도 마신 상태였고, 신경안정제랑 수면제를 섞어놨는데 무작위로 한 움큼 쥐어서 먹었습니다.”라고 진술하기 시작하였으나(2019고단2819호 증거기록 제216, 225쪽), 피고인 제출의 증 제1호증만으로는 이러한 피고인의 진술이 사실이라고 보기 어렵고, 달리 이와 같이 볼 만한 객관적인 사정은 발견할 수 없는 점, ② 피고인은 이 사건 특수상해 범행 당시의 상황에 대하여 경찰 및 검찰 조사...