1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court as to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of violating the Attorney-at-Law Act on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on Article 109 subparag. 1 of the Attorney-at-Law Act (amended by Act No. 8991 of Mar.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to reverse the first instance judgment and acquitted the Defendant on the charge of fraud among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, on the ground that there is no evidence of crime. In so doing, the lower

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.