On August 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2013, and on July 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 5, 2013.

1. On November 9, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on November 20, 2010, the victim C’s studio located in the window B of Changwon-si, was able to pay the drinking value to C; and (b) ordered the two mains and ordered the two mains to do so.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the drinking value, etc.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being provided the f20,000 won by deceiving the victim, and by deceiving the victim, 20,000 won, such as the two-way disease and the 2.1 billion won service charge.

2. On December 1, 2010, at around 22:00, the Defendant, by deceiving the said victim in the same manner as in paragraph (1), and then by deceiving the victim through the same method, and by deceiving the victim, he/she was provided with spawals, etc., and not paying a total of KRW 1,240,000,00, such as the two weeks of disease and 3.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc., inquiry reports, investigation reports, application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

3. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

4. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exemption Criminal Act (the crime of fraud and the crime of previous conviction in the judgment above shall be exempted from punishment in consideration of the equality in the case where the judgment has been rendered at the same time).