무고
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal, G, J, K, and M’s statement, the developments leading up to each of the instant contracts, and the developments leading up to the termination of the aggregate supply contract between F and I stock companies, etc., the lower court accepted the Defendant’s statement without credibility and rendered a not guilty verdict of the facts charged in this case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. The lower court determined as follows: (a) With respect to the preparation process of the instant agreement for the production and transport of aggregate, the statement from the investigative agency or the lower court by J, K, M, and G is not consistent; (b) the trendal statement is most difficult; (c) R is under a subcontract for the production and transport of aggregate from LF to L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”); and (d) the formation of a contract for the production and transport of aggregate from L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”); (c) the construction of the instant agreement for the production and transport of aggregate was subcontracted to R; and (d) the construction of the instant agreement for the transport of tin/ aggregate was re-subcontracted to L; and (e) the construction of the first / aggregate transport agreement between R and F was not formally separated and prepared; and (e) the construction of the first / aggregate transport agreement between R and F was not the same as the construction of the unit price or the unit price for the production and transport of aggregate in order to pay the position at the request of L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”).