However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 7, 2016, around 11:13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported by the Defendant in the vicinity of the apartment parking lot in the Dongdong-gu, Busan, which was located in 2-dong, Busan, to check the circumstances where the slope C, a police officer belonging to the Busan, Dong-dong Police Station B, was reported to check the situation where the slope C was reported.

“The breath of “” and was sallled by breathing flaps.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer on the dispatch of 112 report and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Jan. 1, 2