If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On September 9, 2012, around 00:45, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim E (age 46) who was a slope belonging to the D district unit of the said police station, sent out after receiving a report of 112 during the disturbance, such as, under the influence of alcohol to enter the police station in Ansan-dong 578-8, Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Annyang-si, the Defendant did not for the purpose of visiting the police station, and took a bath to the police station. On September 9, 2012, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim during the hearing of two combat police officers (age 46), including the above C, and one other police officers, for the purpose of visiting the police station. The Defendant “Is the victim who was sent to the police station after receiving a report of 112.”

2. The Defendant, at around 00:55 on the same day, arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender for the foregoing reasons, and publicly insultd the victim under the preceding paragraph by openly insulting the victim to the same victim as “I am, gree, snick, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, snicking, and snicking snicking,” with the same victim as other police officers and civil petitioners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of video materials and CCTV-recording materials;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good, and it is necessary to punish the Defendant with strict punishment considering the Defendant’s majority of criminal records.

However, the defendant seems to have caused the crime of this case with drinking habits.