beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.05.02 2018고단4325

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

No. 1, 3, or 4 of the evidence seized by the defendant shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2018, the Defendant: (a) took custody of money against many unspecified victims by misrepresenting them to investigative agencies, referring to the name and non-titled name name name B, etc. to a police officer; (b) the Defendant:

If the victims remit money to a deposit account under the name of a third party in the course of committing a fraud by misrepresenting a financial institution or a lending company without the intent or ability of a loan, the victims collected cash withdrawn from the nominal owner of the deposit account and remitted it to another deposit account designated by the officers and employees of the above B, etc., and received 150,000 won allowances and additional expenses a day.

1. On October 2018, 2018, the victim C was transferred KRW 10 million from the victim’s deposit account in the name of E in a false statement to the police officer who called “D bank, which may be a low interest rate if the existing loan is repaid.” On October 29, 2018, the victim transferred the amount of KRW 10 million from the victim’s deposit account in the name of E (G). On the same day, the above E withdrawn KRW 10 million from the above E’s deposit account on the same day, and the Defendant, at around 14:00 on the same day, returned the above amount of KRW 10 million to the non-deposit deposit account designated by B after receiving the above amount of KRW 10 million from Ma or E in the front of the head office of the J-dong Station of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with those who were not influent with the name of H and one-person B, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim.

2. On October 29, 2018, a member in charge of fraud against the victim K made a false statement to the effect that “L bank is a L bank, and it is possible to grant a low interest loan if the existing loan is repaid. It is possible to repay the existing loan to a designated deposit account.” The same day from this day is F in the name of E from the victim.