beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.08 2016나82685

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment is modified as follows.

The defendant is against the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part written after the dismissal of the first instance court No. 3, 10-11 of the judgment of the first instance court is "the insurer, and the plaintiff B's wife, the plaintiff C, and the plaintiff's children are the insurer."

Part 3 12 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deleted from "No. 2 1 through No. 3".

Each "Plaintiff" of the 3th 15th 15th and 5th 21th 21th son of the first instance judgment shall be written in "Plaintiff".

The 3rd to 9th to 9th 5th 19th 10 of the first instance judgment (the 3rd 19th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 100

The fourth 10 to 12th 12 of the judgment of the first instance court (based on recognition) shall be applied as follows.

Statement [Ground for Recognition] No. 21, 24 through 26, 31, 36, 37, 15, 18, 19, each statement of evidence No. 21, 24 through 26, 31, 36, 37, 15, 18, 19

[] In the first instance court's decision No. 4, 18 of the first instance court's decision, "this court" was adopted to "the first instance court". The results of the commission of physical appraisal to the K Hospital director and the fact inquiry results, significant facts, and the purport of the entire arguments.

The 6th written judgment of the court of first instance shall consist of the 5th written judgment of the court of first instance with "the name of the person who has been reduced," "the name of the person who has been reduced."

The registration of "registration of transportation business" in the 20 to 21th sentence of the first instance court shall be applied to "registration of transportation business".

From 6th to 14th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall apply:

Inasmuch as the Plaintiff alleged that the sum of KRW 26,741,660 was spent for the treatment costs of the Plaintiff, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff’s proof alone was the cost of installing a motor vehicle lifts (8,880,000) and the cost of purchasing a DNA siren (2,00,000 won) for the treatment of the Plaintiff, and that each of the medical treatment costs in the evidence No. 34 was not necessarily required for the treatment of the Plaintiff.