도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (definite and misunderstanding of legal principles) stated that the witness shocked with the Garail Day (hereinafter “the instant Garail”) which is a traffic facility managed by the U.S. in Ulsan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “the instant Ga”) that the Defendant was driving, but there was no damaged Gara on the rear part of the instant Garail, and there was no red lail trace of the instant Garail on the instant Garail, and there was no red lade of the instant 65cc or 68cc adjacent to the ground among the Garail of the instant Ga, which differs in height from the instant Garail. In light of the fact that the Garail had no effect on the instant Gara due to misunderstanding of legal principles and the degree of damage to the Defendant’s vehicle and the instant Garail, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant Garail on the ground that the Garail had no effect on the instant Gara.
2. According to the records of this case, the defendant agreed in the court below that the part of the reporter's statement among ① internal investigation report (statement No. 10) (Evidence List No. 10), ② investigation report (Evidence List No. 12), ③ investigation report (Evidence List No. 19), ④ investigation report (Traffic List No. 23), ④ investigation report (Traffic No. 23), ④ investigation report (Evidence List No. 24), ⑤ Investigation Report No. 5 (Evidence List No. 24) report (Evidence List No. 34) and E were admitted as evidence.
(1) The above, (2), (3) (the part concerning the statement E), (4) (the part concerning the statement of witnesses E), and (5) (the part concerning the statement of witnesses E) are hearsay evidence the contents of which are witness’s telephone hearing.