A. The “C” produced by the Defendant as a misunderstanding of facts is the “video product” and, without the need to be classified by the Game Water Management Committee, only under the Korea Media Rating Board’s grading examination, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case by misunderstanding the fact that the Defendant distributed “C” without being classified by the Committee’s rating on Game Water Management.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) According to the investigation report (the original and the gap classified as “C” advertising film rating), the Defendant produced “C” (hereinafter “the instant video product”) which is a video product for the purpose of treating gambling addiction, and received a grading examination (class classification number: N andO) from the Video Rating Board, and the Defendant asserted that “C” (hereinafter “the instant game product”) which is held as a game product at the lower court is the same as the instant video product, and that there is no need to be classified by the Game Water Management Committee because it is not a game product.

(2) 살피건대, 원심에서 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들 및 이들 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들 즉, ① 이 사건 영상물은 처음과 마지막 모두 아나운서가 도박 중독에 관한 경각심을 일깨우는 내용이 나오고 중간에 경마체험이 1회만 있으며 경마게임과 관련된 음성 또한 작게 들리지만, 이 사건 게임 물에 사용된 영상은 처음부터 화면이 깜박거리면서 아나운서의 설명과 별도로 경마게임이 진행되는 것으로 보이고 그 음성 또한 아나운서의 설명을 알아듣기 곤란한 정도로 크게 들리며 경마게임도 1번만 할 수 있는 것이 아니라...