On June 28, 2019, from around 02:44 to 02:56 the same day, the Defendant infringed upon the victim’s residence by viewing the victim’s b body or shower, etc., through the window of the victim’s residence, in light of the victim’s breath or shower, etc., to satisfy his/her sexual desire.

In addition, the Defendant, in mind of meeting his sexual desire, entered a total of eight times, such as the list of crimes, into the victim’s residence, and invaded upon the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Each investigation report; 7.2. Verification of CCTV images, interview of victims,

6. 30. Checking CCTV images;

6. 28. The result of the following: (a) the verification of CCTV images against a suspect; (b) the photograph, intrusion route, and field situation; (c) the analysis of surrounding CCTV at the time of committing the crime on June 28, 2019; (d) the analysis of surrounding CCTV at the time of committing the crime on June 30, 2019; (c) the analysis of surrounding CCTV at the time of committing the crime; (d) the verification of whether the victim’s internal structure and crime prevention establishment; (e) additional CCTV images against the suspect A’s head of committing the crime; (e) the verification of the CCTV images against the suspect;

Above 6. 28

7.2.2.Additional CCTV analysis ① allowing access to the place of crime between the two, 2. The date of additional crime by a suspect (6.1/1)

6. 30. 1 case, CCTV analysis ① The date of additional crime of a suspect (6. 30. 1/

7.1.1.1.The CCTV analysis2

6. 28. Additional analysis of CCTV recording data taken at the time of committing a crime;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the closure of CCTV in the vicinity of the generated area;

1. In light of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, the prosecutor, on the premise that the crime of entering a house chip as indicated in the judgment is in a substantive concurrent relationship, has been prosecuted as concurrent crimes, but repeatedly commits the same kind of crime for a certain period under the same and continuous criminal intent.