If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 14, 2016, at around 00:10, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of “D cafeteria” located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of the Defendant, and the guard of the police box belonging to the police station E box in Seoul, which was called upon 112 during that period, controlled the Defendant, the Defendant was under the control of the Defendant, and the Defendant was under the control of the F’s chest on one occasion by hand, and the Defendant was under the control of the F’s chest on one occasion by his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch duty by police officers F. F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photographic and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes to a police box;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the criminal liability of the defendant for the reason of sentencing is not weak, it shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of and reflect against the crime; (b) there is no criminal record in Korea; (c) contingent crimes; and (d) the defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship; (b) motive and consequence of the crime; and (c) the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case.