2. The judgment follows: (a) the Defendant could have been punished for the same crime including a sentence and a suspended sentence; (b) the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes without being able to engage in a repeated crime due to a drunk driving; (c) the instant crime of drunk driving is driven under the influence of alcohol by 0.243% with a blood alcohol concentration; and (d) the nature of the offense and the criminal situation are heavy in light of the substance thereof; and (c) each of the instant crime of without a license under the influence of alcohol was committed on August 29, 2012 when the first trial was in progress on March 16, 2013, when considering the nature and circumstances of the offense and the criminal circumstances are very bad in light of the content thereof, the sentence of the Defendant’s punishment is recognized as appropriate, and thus, the above assertion is insufficient.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.