If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant, at around December 4, 2017, posted the Defendant’s residence in Seocheon-si C, and the Defendant posted the Defendant’s “Sales of Lone-to-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone-Lone

“The above mentioned attitude as the sale of the above clothing was shown.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above clothing to the injured party.

On December 4, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 130,000 from the injured party to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant, from the time when he received transfer of KRW 130,00,00 from the injured party, and received KRW 895,00 in total by deceiving the victims seven times from January 2, 2018, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table of Crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each statement of E, F, G, D, H, I, and J;

1. The issuance of a deposit certificate, each Messen dialogue, account inquiries, and detailed inquiries about details of financial network transactions, each Internet bulletin, and inquiries about details of transactions, certificates of results of the transfer of ccck banks, certificates of results of remittance, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of ccc bank transfers certificates;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a planned crime of provisional payment order.

It shall not be deemed that multiple victims are victims, and their property and mental damage are less severe.

There was no effort to recover damage.

However, the defendant shows the attitude of recognizing and opposing the wrongness of the defendant.

There is no criminal history prior to the instant case.

The amount of fraud is not much.

In addition, punishment is imposed on the defendants of similar cases.