All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence of the lower court (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We also examine the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing.

The Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime, and M and the victim G did not want to be punished against the Defendant, under the mutual agreement with M and the victim G, the president of the restaurant where the victim D was working.

On the other hand, the defendant has been subject to punishment for the same crime, and in particular, he committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime for the same crime.

In addition, taking into account the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it cannot be deemed that it is too heavy or too unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.