저작권법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. No summary of the facts charged shall be infringed by means of reproduction, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, etc. of authors' property rights or other property rights protected as property rights;
Nevertheless, on February 3, 2013, the Defendant, who was enrolled in the Defendant’s name on February 3, 2013, sold the same image lectures from the NDBBB’s NDBBBB website, and, as a result, opened the video of the Victim C’s C’s cinematographic work, and received money from others.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the victim’s copyright by the above act.
2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under Article 140 of the same Act. According to the records, the facts charged can be acknowledged as a cancellation of the Defendant’s complaint on May 15, 2014, after the victim’s indictment was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.