However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 11:00 on July 10, 2016, the Defendant was in front of the exit No. 184, 5, Ma-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Mapo-gu, 184, and was in common knowledge.

During the process of drinking C and the victim D, the victim was fluored with the victim who was fluored by C on the ground that C was brudous or bad to the Defendant, and the victim was fluord with the victim’s head.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. The protocol of interrogation of the police in relation to C (the evidence mentioned above shows that the victim was at the time of facing the defendant's face in order to speak the defendant who was under C and C's body fighting, and the defendant was at the time of the defendant's face, and it can be recognized that the defendant was at the victim's head by taking the head of the victim who was under C and alcohol after his body fighting, and the defendant was at the victim's head from his body fighting. Thus, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed violence against the victim's head due to his own illness, and this is an act to defend the victim from violence against C

more than 100

The defendant and his defense counsel's legitimate defense is without merit as it constitutes an attack against the victim.

Application of Statutes

1. Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. In light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed several times, despite the history of punishment for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the possibility of leading to the serious progress of the victim's hair, the responsibility for the crime of this case is unlimited, but the defendant is detained for three months, the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, the defendant does not have any history of punishment exceeding the fine, and the defendant's age, sexual behavior is committed.