2. The judgment of the court below seems to have imposed a fine of 4 million won, which is reduced by 6 million won in total in accordance with the summary order, considering all the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant made confession of all the crimes in this case and made an agreement with 13 victims of property damage and damage, and the fact that the court below agreed with 13 victims of property damage and the fact that the crime in this case aims to secure the claim for construction cost, which might be taken into account somewhat the circumstances of the crime, etc., which are favorable to the defendant, or that there was a history of criminal punishment several times, and that there was no agreement with 25 victims up to the trial. The court below seems to have imposed a fine of 4 million won, which is reduced by 6 million won in total in accordance with the summary order, taking into account all the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no change of circumstances different from the judgment below and the punishment of the defendant, and there is no other reason to change the defendant's age, character

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition