If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 21, 2020, the Defendant 2020, 5079, on July 21, 2020, after drinking alcohol to the victim B (the remaining, 23 years old) of male-friendly job offers (the remaining, 23 years old, etc.) and then filed a dispute over the issue of accommodation between the victim and the mother.

The Defendant, on the ground that the victimized person refuses to accommodation and provides a fake card, took the victim's entrance and head by hand, shouldered the victim's left buck, and met the victim's face by drinking.

As a result, the defendant put the victim's left side with the number of days of treatment not known to the victim.

"200 Highest 5976"

1. On May 18, 2020, the Defendant assaulted the Victim F ( South, 25 years old) of the Victim B’s E-gu Victim F ( South, 25 years old) who discovered that the Defendant was able to take the face of B at the front of Suwon-si E-Ba, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant’s hand floor at around 01:0 on May 18, 2020 when the Defendant was able to take the face of the Victim F with the floor of the

2. The defendant who damages property shall take out his mobile phone from the victim F at the place specified in paragraph (1); and

112 With the defect of the report made by the victim, the victim's jumal jumth 10 cellular phones was laid down on the floor by cutting off 10 cell phoness used by the victim's jumal jum jum, and was taken by the jum jum jum so that the market is damaged by destroying the amount of the cellular phone and the back glass.

Summary of Evidence

" 2020 Highest 5079"

1. Damage photographs of the defendant's legal statements B and G in each written statement of the defendant, "20 Godan 5976";

1. Application of the F’s statement in the Defendant’s legal statement to the scene photographs, and the damaged mobile phone pictures;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant was punished two times by a fine for the same kind of crime under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the instant crimes was committed again.