A. The victims did not have been injured because they were living alone while driving at a slow speed of misunderstanding of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victims of the instant accident can be recognized as having suffered injury, such as crypitis that requires treatment for about two weeks, so the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments of unreasonable sentencing and the fact that the Defendant had a criminal record of the same kind, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.