beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.03.15 2017고단4186

업무상과실치상

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the business owner was aware that he would not have a worker aboard a simplified transport outlet, the defendant had the victim E (43 years, inn) who was a worker on duty at the above restaurant in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, for the purpose of transporting food materials directly boarding the 1st floor or going up to the 2nd floor by using the above lifts, and caused the victim's injury to the worker under his jurisdiction by failing to take any measures such as failing to take any measures to refrain from using the lifts, etc. even though other employees seen to go up to the 2nd floor, and caused the victim's injury to the 1st to the 1st to the 2nd to the 1st to the 2nd to the 1st to the 1st to the 2nd to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 2nd to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the th to the th to the m.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Some of the police statements made to F, G, and H;

1. Medical certificates and opinions;

1. Simplified dyp photographs, and the victim's reproduction photographs;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. The defendant's assertion on the video CD was asserted to the purport that the defendant fulfilled his duty of care to prevent accidents by attaching a warning board to prohibit boarding the instant simple lifts, providing safety education to employees, such as not boarding the lifts, and allowing employees to do so, and allowing employees to do so, such as the victim, in a single-service worker, such as the victim, to do so, and it was not foreseeable that the victim would be involved in the kitchen work, and that it was not possible for the victim to expect that he/she would be engaged in the kitchen work, and that it was unlikely that the victim would not have predicted that he/she was to put food in the lifts and to get on board the lifts.

The following is acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.