However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who served as the C branch of the Korea Rural Community Corporation from April 2005 to June 2010.

In collusion with D on March 2009, the Defendant recommended the victim E to rent the land owned by the Korea Rural Community Corporation through D as to the total sum of six parcels of land, such as a notice of square meters, which is the ownership of the Korea Rural Community Corporation, the sum of six parcels of land, such as a notice of square meters, which is 83 meters of land owned by the Korea Rural Community Corporation.

However, in fact, if the land owned by the Korea Rural Community Corporation intends to be disused, the land was first disused by the Korea Rural Community Corporation and sold through open bidding, and thus, the land was not subject to disuse and is not subject to disuse and is not expected to be disused, and thus, there was no intention or ability to get the said land lost even if the land was leased by the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant stated, “In order to acquire the right of lease of land at a low price, the lessee shall have the preferential right to purchase the land at a low price.” The Defendant stated, “In order to acquire the right of lease of land, the amount of KRW 200 million, including the premium, should be required, and a prior opinion should be made to the employees in charge.” On July 2009, the Defendant decided to pay the land lessee KRW 150 million as the premium.” On April 21, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 11 million from the victim as the deposit account in Dong G G for the expenses of the Defendant on April 21, 2009, and around August 14, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 110 million from the Defendant’s bank account in the Defendant’s wife’s location as the premium for the lease of the land.

9. It received a total of KRW 160 million on four occasions, such as receiving KRW 25 million on August 2, 200, and KRW 15 million on or around the 22th day of the same month, and received KRW 160 million on the pretext of expenses and premium.

Accordingly, the defendant induces the victim in collusion with D.