부정당업자 입찰참가자격 제한처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a company established on January 30, 2013 and engaged in the production, sale, etc. of housing materials, and a person who completed the registration of qualification to participate in a competition by designating goods and construction as the registered field pursuant to Article 15 of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to Which the State Is a Party
B. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant announced the purchase of procurement commodities (a contract with multiple suppliers) as follows.
1. Public notice of the details submitted for purchase: Item C purchase management number: Item C: Estimated price of 1,00,000 square meters for purchase: 27,272,727,272: The place of delivery of the place of delivery for the lower-level delivery: The time limit for delivery for the lower-level delivery: General (3) method of contract: The method of selecting contracting parties under a contract with multiple suppliers: The basis for selecting contracting parties under a contract with multiple suppliers: the contract period under this public notice of purchase: the contract period under this public notice of purchase on June 30, 2016: the contract period under this public notice of purchase: the contract period under this public notice of purchase that was concluded on July 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015;
2. Matters concerning application for participation in purchase: A manufacturer registered as the tenth-place (E) of the detailed commodity name number in the commodity list number among the national comprehensive electronic procurement system registration regulations for participation in bidding (F public notice of the Government Procurement Service and March 5, 2014).
C. On September 9, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to supply D 35,000 meters to each end-user institution from September 9, 2015 to June 30, 2016.
(hereinafter “instant contract”). D.
On April 28, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied 21,156,000 won of the supply amount to the Chungcheongnam-do H, an end-user institution, with respect to G business issues.
However, the plaintiff did not directly manufacture and produce the above pedestrian mat at the time, but purchased the import completion product.