A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Defendant

A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for perjury at the Incheon District Court on May 29, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 4, 2014.

"2014 Highest 3630"

1. On October 15, 2013, Defendant A, at the time of the uttering of the above-mentioned investigative document, has a summary of the facts charged as follows.

As stated in paragraph (1), the amount of money that F et al. stated that F et al. paid for the purchase of the above land was the loan for use other than the purchase of the above land, and the strengthened-gun L et al. and M et al., which were originally owned by it and entrusted to K et al., and repaid the above loan by transferring the above loan to F et al., in the name of J, which was 30 million won, by borrowing KRW 330 million from the F et al., which was the criminal facts, and the criminal facts were accused of the fraud. When the relevant civil litigation was conducted, the amount of money that the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government stated that F et al. paid to F et al. for the purchase of the above land was the loan for the above purpose, and the amount of money that F et al. paid to F et al., which was the sole possession of the above land and the above loan was not related to F et al.

Accordingly, on November 8, 2013, the above Defendant was investigated into fraud in the investigation of the Incheon Southern Police Station and the economic 4 team office on November 8, 2013, and under the title “Agreement” F, A, under the title “Agreement”;

1. The above Party A was a real estate located in the Incheon Strengthening-gun N, which was purchased under the name of her mother under the condition for repayment of the said money, and thus, the relationship between Party A, B, and H was resolved, since the said money was purchased under the name of her mother under the condition for repayment of the said money.

2. Since claims and obligations arising from the repayment of such obligations as above with substitute claims are terminated, G and H need not re-incriminate claims against B with respect to the above obligations after the vehicle.

3. In addition, Gap shall register the above real estate received as a substitute.