beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.07.15 2015고단194

유가증권위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging securities at the District Court on the 10th of the same month, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on May 3, 2013. On the 11st of the same month, the same court was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging securities and one year of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2014 by the same court on September 12, 2014.

The Defendant is a person who had been working as the secretary of the “E certified judicial scrivener” office of the Korean Judicial scrivener in Namyang-si from May 10, 2010 to December 201.

1. On December 9, 2010, the Defendant: (a) stated in the promissory note paper “F”, “F0 million won”, “B0 million won”, and “F on December 9, 2010,” without authority, the Defendant forged a promissory note in the name of D, a securities certified judicial scrivener’s name, with an official seal attached to the said office, with the intent to borrow money from F, without authority; (b) indicated in the column of issuance “F”, “E certified judicial scrivener D and South Korean judicial scrivener C, etc.; and (c) indicated in the column of issuance “F”, “F”, “F million won” and “F, etc. on December 9, 2010.”

2. The Defendant exercised forged securities by delivering one promissory note in the name of a certified judicial scrivener who forged it to F, as if it were actually issued, at the time, and at the place mentioned in paragraph (1) above.

3. The fraud accused, at the time, at the time, and place mentioned in the above Paragraph 1 above, conducted as if the securities were issued with the consent of the above Certified Judicial Scriveners D, and falsely stated that “If the money is lent to the victim F that it is urgently required to carry out the apartment sale registration, the interest shall be sufficiently repaid.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the borrowed money, and the above securities were forged.